Atencio et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
| Tammy Atencio and Justin Atencio |
| Boston Scientific Corporation |
| 2:2016cv08829 |
| September 13, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Charleston Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Joseph R. Goodwin |
| Personal Injury- Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER The 6 MOTION by Boston Scientific Corporation to Dismiss With Prejudice is DENIED without prejudice; the plaintiff must serve her completed PFS on BSC on or before 6/11/2018; failure to comply with this Order may result in dismissal with prejudice upon motion by BSC; plaintiff's counsel is directed to send a copy of this Order to the plaintiff via certified mail, return receipt requested, and file a copy of the receipt. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 5/10/2018. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (st)
|
|
Filing
4
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER denying 3 MOTION by Boston Scientific Corporation to Dismiss, as more fully set forth herein; the plaintiffs have 30 business days from the entry of this Order to submit to BSC a completed PPF; failure to comply with this Order will result in dismissal upon motion by the defendant; plaintiffs' counsel send a copy of this Order to the plaintiffs via certified mail, return receipt requested, and file a copy of the receipt. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 4/14/2017. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (mek)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
