Holland et al v. Consol Energy Inc.
| Michael H. Holland, Joseph R. Reschini, Carlo Tarley and United Mine Workers of America 1992 Benefit Plan |
| Consol Energy Inc. |
| 2:2017cv02091 |
| March 30, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Charleston Office |
| Kanawha |
| Thomas E. Johnston |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1002 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER the Court FINDS that it lacks subject-matter jurisdiction over plaintiffs' claims; DISMISSES the Complaint and DIRECTS the Clerk to remove this action from the docket of the Court; denying as moot the parties' 29 MOTION for Summary Judgment and 31 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Thomas E. Johnston on 9/10/2018. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (taq)
|
|
Filing
39
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER pursuant to the 7 MOTION by Consol Energy Inc. to Dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), for improper venue under Rule 12(b)(3), and for failure to st ate a claim pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6); denying the Motion to Dismiss insofar as it is brought under Rule 12(b)(3) and denying as moot the remaining grounds therein. Signed by Judge Thomas E. Johnston on 3/26/2018. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (taq)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
