Pritt v. Henry
Lydia Kathryn Pritt |
Holly R. Henry |
2:2017cv02953 |
May 12, 2017 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Charleston Office |
Kanawha |
Thomas E. Johnston |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 4 MOTION by Lydia Kathryn Pritt to Remand; the Court REMANDS this case to the Circuit Court of Kanawha County, West Virginia; directing this matter removed from the Court's docket. Signed by Judge Thomas E. Johnston on 10/20/2017. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (taq) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Pritt v. Henry | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Lydia Kathryn Pritt | |
Represented By: | Michael J. Del Giudice |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Holly R. Henry | |
Represented By: | M. Andrew Brison |
Represented By: | Kameron T. Miller |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.