West Virginia State University Board of Governors v. The Dow Chemical Company et al
| West Virginia State University Board of Governors |
| The Dow Chemical Company, Union Carbide Corporation, Bayer Corporation, Bayer CropScience LP, Bayer CropScience Holding Inc., Rhone-Poulenc Inc., Rhone-Poulenc AG Company, Rhone-Poulenc AG Company, Inc. and Aventis Cropscience USA LP |
| 2:2017cv03558 |
| July 7, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Charleston Office |
| Kanawha |
| John T. Copenhaver |
| Torts to Land |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 6901 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
80
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing that defendants' request for a temporary stay is granted insofar as they are entitled to a 30-day automatic stay under Rule 62(a); further directing that the court's 75 order on 6/1/2020, remanding t his civil action to the Circuit Court of Kanawha County, West Virginia be and it hereby is, stayed until 7/1/2020. Signed by Senior District Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 6/8/2020. (cc: counsel of record; Circuit Court of Kanawha County, West Virginia) (msa)
|
|
Filing
74
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing that the 10 motion to remand is granted and this case is remanded to the Circuit Court of Kanawha County, West Virginia; plaintiff's motion is denied as to the request for fees and costs associated with this remand. Signed by Senior District Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 6/1/2020. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (kew)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
