Sansom v. TSI Corp.

Sansom v. TSI Corp.

Plaintiff:	Alva Sansom
Defendant:	TSI Corp.
Case Number:	2:2017cv04444
Filed:	December 1, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office:	Charleston Office
County:	Kanawha
Presiding Judge:	Joseph R. Goodwin
Nature of Suit:	Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 12101
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 13, 2019	Filing 105 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 95 MOTION by Alutiiq LLC, Alutiiq Technical Services, LLC to Dismiss 67 Corrected First Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 3/13/2019. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (taq)
November 26, 2018	Filing 66 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 63 MOTION by Alva Sansom to Amend Motion to Amend Deadline and Complaint and 63 -1 Amended Motion to Amend Deadline and Complaint, except to the extent that it seeks any rulings that concern or implicate substantive issues, such as the statute of limitations or the doctrine of relation back; DIRECTS the Clerk to file the Corrected First Amended Complaint [ECF No. 63-2] as the operative pleading in this matter; the plaintiff to obtain appropriate s ervice of process upon the newly-joined defendants pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; an amended scheduling order follows. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 11/26/2018. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (taq)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 13, 2019

Filing 105 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 95 MOTION by Alutiiq LLC, Alutiiq Technical Services, LLC to Dismiss 67 Corrected First Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 3/13/2019. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (taq)

November 26, 2018

Filing 66 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 63 MOTION by Alva Sansom to Amend Motion to Amend Deadline and Complaint and 63 -1 Amended Motion to Amend Deadline and Complaint, except to the extent that it seeks any rulings that concern or implicate substantive issues, such as the statute of limitations or the doctrine of relation back; DIRECTS the Clerk to file the Corrected First Amended Complaint [ECF No. 63-2] as the operative pleading in this matter; the plaintiff to obtain appropriate s ervice of process upon the newly-joined defendants pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; an amended scheduling order follows. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 11/26/2018. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (taq)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sansom v. TSI Corp.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alva Sansom
Represented By:	Allan N. Karlin
Represented By:	Jane E. Peak
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: TSI Corp.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?