Lilly v. W.V. Regional Jail Authority
Nicholas Andrew Lilly |
W.V. Regional Jail Authority |
2:2017cv04470 |
December 4, 2017 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Charleston Office |
Kanawha |
Dwane L. Tinsley |
John T. Copenhaver |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing that the findings made in the 6 Proposed Findings and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are adopted by the Court. Directing that the complaint is dismissed. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 6/25/2019. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (lca) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Lilly v. W.V. Regional Jail Authority | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Nicholas Andrew Lilly | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: W.V. Regional Jail Authority | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.