Pringle v. Sevier

Petitioner: Roger Pringle
Respondent: Mark Sevier
Case Number: 2:2018cv00050
Filed: January 12, 2018
Court: West Virginia Southern District Court
Office: Charleston Office
County: Kanawha
Presiding Judge: Thomas E. Johnston
Referring Judge: Dwane L. Tinsley
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 4, 2018 7 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The Court ADOPTS the 6 Proposed Findings and Recommendation, DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE the 1 Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, and DENIE S AS MOOT the 2 Petition for Order Waiving Filing Fees and Court Costs; the Clerk is directed to remove this action from the docket of the Court. Signed by Judge Thomas E. Johnston on 10/4/2018. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (kp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pringle v. Sevier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Roger Pringle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Mark Sevier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?