Lamar v. Boston Scientific Corporation

Lamar v. Boston Scientific Corporation

Plaintiff:	Joan Lamar
Defendant:	Boston Scientific Corporation
Case Number:	2:2018cv00090
Filed:	January 25, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office:	Charleston Office
County:	XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:	Joseph R. Goodwin
Nature of Suit:	Personal Injury- Product Liability
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 24, 2020	Filing 28 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The 20 MOTION by Boston Scientific Corporation to Dismiss With Prejudice is GRANTED in part to the extent BSC seeks dismissal and DENIED insofar as BSC seeks dismissal with prejudice; BSC is dismissed without prejudice, and this case is closed and stricken from the court's docket; any remaining pending motions are DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 9/24/2020. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (kew)
May 17, 2018	Filing 10 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: The 6 MOTION by Boston Scientific Corporation to Dismiss With Prejudice is DENIED without prejudice; plaintiffs must serve their completed PFS on BSC on or before 6/18/2018; failure to comply with this Order may result in dismissal with prejudice upon motion by BSC; plaintiffs' counsel is directed to send a copy of this Order to the plaintiffs via certified mail, return receipt requested, and file a copy of the receipt. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 5/17/2018. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (btm)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 24, 2020

Filing 28 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The 20 MOTION by Boston Scientific Corporation to Dismiss With Prejudice is GRANTED in part to the extent BSC seeks dismissal and DENIED insofar as BSC seeks dismissal with prejudice; BSC is dismissed without prejudice, and this case is closed and stricken from the court's docket; any remaining pending motions are DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 9/24/2020. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (kew)

May 17, 2018

Filing 10 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: The 6 MOTION by Boston Scientific Corporation to Dismiss With Prejudice is DENIED without prejudice; plaintiffs must serve their completed PFS on BSC on or before 6/18/2018; failure to comply with this Order may result in dismissal with prejudice upon motion by BSC; plaintiffs' counsel is directed to send a copy of this Order to the plaintiffs via certified mail, return receipt requested, and file a copy of the receipt. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 5/17/2018. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (btm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lamar v. Boston Scientific Corporation
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joan Lamar
Represented By:	Jacob Alex Flint
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Boston Scientific Corporation
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?