Smith v. South Central Regional Jail

Plaintiff: Terry W. Smith
Defendant: South Central Regional Jail
Case Number: 2:2018cv00367
Filed: February 28, 2018
Court: West Virginia Southern District Court
Office: Charleston Office
County: Kanawha
Referring Judge: Dwane L. Tinsley
Presiding Judge: John T. Copenhaver
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 5, 2018 12 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting and incorporating the 11 Proposed Findings and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge; directing that the complaints are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 10/5/2018. (cc: plaintiff, pro se; counsel of record; United States Magistrate Judge) (taq)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. South Central Regional Jail
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Terry W. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: South Central Regional Jail
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?