Cordwell v. Widen et al
Plaintiff: Tania Cordwell
Defendant: James Widen, West Virginia Division of Corrections and John Doe
Case Number: 2:2018cv00913
Filed: May 11, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office: Charleston Office
County: Kanawha
Presiding Judge: John T. Copenhaver
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 217 ORDER denying 200 MOTION by Tania Cordwell to Compel Defendant, West Virginia Division of Corrections to Fully Respond to Plaintiffs' Second Set of Discovery Requests, as more fully set forth herein. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley on 10/16/2019. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (kew)
August 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 183 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The 66 , 69 , 72 Motions to Dismiss are GRANTED IN PART, and the direct and vicarious liability claims against the WVDOC and the direct liability claim against Stubblefield for negligent hiring, training, supervis ion, and retention which constitute portions of Count I and Count V are DISMISSED, and the motions insofar as they seek dismissal of the Amended Complaints in their entirety are DENIED IN PART; directing Beach's 137 , 139 , and 141 Part ial Motions to Dismiss are GRANTED and any claims brought against him in his official capacity and any standalone damages claim against him are DISMISSED; pursuant to Plaintiffs' stipulations, any vicarious liability claims against the WVDOC that are premised on the intentional actions of any Defendant, any vicariously liability claims against Stubblefield, any § 1983 claims brought against Stubblefield in her official capacity, and any civil conspiracy claims against any Defendant are DISMISSED, as more fully set forth herein. Signed by Judge Thomas E. Johnston on 8/15/2019. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (ts)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cordwell v. Widen et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tania Cordwell
Represented By: Michael A. Woelfel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Widen
Represented By: Julie Meeks Greco
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: West Virginia Division of Corrections
Represented By: Lou Ann S. Cyrus
Represented By: Dominick R. Pellegrin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?