Knouse et al v. Primecare Medical of West Virginia, Inc. et al
Hannah Knouse and Charles Knouse |
Primecare Medical of West Virginia, Inc., Primecare Medical, Inc., The West Virginia Regional Jail and Correctional Facility Authority, Brad Douglas, James Chandler, Megan Berry, Shawana Bradshaw Downs, Roxana Saltsgaver, Kim Jewell and John/Jane Does |
2:2018cv01014 |
June 7, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Charleston Office |
Kanawha |
Joseph R. Goodwin |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 145 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting the PrimeCare Defendants' 119 and 122 Motions to Dismiss Crossclaims. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 2/5/2019. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (taq) |
Filing 132 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 91 MOTION by James Chandler to Dismiss; except for the §1983 claim in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment and the IIED claim, all other claims against Defendant Chandler are DISMISSED with prejudice; denying the 107 MOTION by Hannah Knouse, Charles Knousee to Seal; the court ORDERS that the 107 Motion to Seal, the plaintiff's 108 Response and its attachment [ECF No. 108-1] be unsealed; directing the p laintiff's counsel to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed in accordance with Rule 11; the plaintiff's counsel has FOURTEEN DAYS from the filing of this Memorandum Opinion and Order to file a memorandum. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 1/17/2019. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (taq) |
Filing 53 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 32 MOTION by Brad Douglas, The West Virginia Regional Jail and Correctional Facility Authority to Dismiss 1 Complaint and 34 MOTION by James Chandler to Dismiss 1 Com plaint; directing that the § 1983 claims against defendants Douglas and Chandler in their official capacities and against the WVRJA be DISMISSED with prejudice; the motion to dismiss the § 1983 claim for violations of the Fourteenth Amen dment against defendants Douglas and Chandler in their individual capacities is DENIED; the remainder of the Complaint against the WVRJA, Douglas, and Chandler is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 9/24/2018. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (opinion published to the court's website, www.wvsd.uscourts.gov) (taq) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.