Apesos et al v. Erie Insurance Property & Casualty Company
| Unborn Child and Margie Apesos |
| Erie Insurance Property & Casualty Company |
| 2:2018cv01219 |
| August 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Charleston Office |
| Kanawha |
| Thomas E Johnston |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 STIPULATION ON DISCOVERY by Margie Apesos, Unborn Child, Erie Insurance Property & Casualty Company (Kesner, Brent) (Modified on 8/21/2018 to add party filer) (kp). |
| Filing 3 ANSWER TO COMPLAINT ATTACHED TO #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand by Erie Insurance Property & Casualty Company. (Perry, Matthew) (Modified on 8/20/2018 to add link to #1 notice of removal and to add jury demand) (kp). |
| CASE assigned to Chief Judge Thomas E. Johnston. (ts) |
| Filing 2 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Tinsley. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (kp) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Erie Insurance Property & Casualty Company with summons, complaint, docket sheet and other miscellaneous documents from Circuit Court of Kanawha County. Filing Fee $400.00. Receipt #AWVSDC-6699820. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (kp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
