Parsons et al v. McDaniel et al
Plaintiff: Machelle Parsons
Defendant: Ashton McDaniel
Case Number: 2:2019cv00177
Filed: March 13, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Nature of Suit: Civil Shell Case Opening
Cause of Action: 77 U.S.C. ยง 7777
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER overruling the plaintiff's 8 Objections and adopting in full the 7 Proposed Findings and Recommendations by Magistrate Judge; dismissing this civil action from the docket and denying the plaintiffs' 1 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 5/1/2019. (cc: Magistrate Judge; counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (mek)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Parsons et al v. McDaniel et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Machelle Parsons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ashton McDaniel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?