Chau et al v. Air Cargo Carriers, LLC et al
| Anh Kim Ho and Virginia Chau |
| Jonathan Pablo Alvarado, Sheriff of Kanawha County, United Parcel Service Co., Air Cargo Carriers, LLC and UPS Airlines, Inc. |
| 2:2019cv00452 |
| June 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Thomas E Johnston |
| Airplane |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 REPLY by Virginia Chau, Anh Kim Ho to #19 Response In Opposition. (Tiano, William) |
| Filing 20 REPLY by Virginia Chau, Anh Kim Ho to #17 Response In Opposition. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit 1) (Tiano, William) |
| Filing 19 RESPONSE by Air Cargo Carriers, LLC in opposition to #9 MOTION by Virginia Chau, Anh Kim Ho to Remand Case to Circuit Court of Kanawha County and #15 SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION by Virginia Chau, Anh Kim Ho to Remand Case to Circuit Court of Kanawha County, JOINDER in #17 Response in Opposition and OBJECTION to Plaintiff's Requested Conditional Discovery re: #15 Supplemental Motion. (Poe, Edgar) (Modified on 7/30/2019 to correct links) (kew). |
Filing 18
ORDER AND NOTICE: Rule 12(b) Motions 8/12/2019. Rule 26(f) Meeting 9/3/2019. Last day to file report of Rule 26(f) Meeting 9/12/2019. Telephonic Scheduling Conference at 3:00 PM on 9/19/2019. Entry of Scheduling Order 9/26/2019. Last Day to make Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures 10/3/2019. Signed by Judge Thomas E. Johnston on 7/29/2019. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (kew)
|
| Filing 17 RESPONSE by United Parcel Service Co. in opposition to #9 MOTION by Virginia Chau, Anh Kim Ho to Remand Case to Circuit Court of Kanawha County and #15 SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION by Virginia Chau, Anh Kim Ho to Remand Case to Circuit Court of Kanawha County. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4)(Moore, Brian) |
| Filing 16 MEMORANDUM by Virginia Chau, Anh Kim Ho in support of #15 SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION by Virginia Chau, Anh Kim Ho to Remand Case to Circuit Court of Kanawha County (Tiano, William) |
| Filing 15 SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION by Virginia Chau, Anh Kim Ho to Remand Case to Circuit Court of Kanawha County (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4)(Tiano, William) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER denying as moot the #8 MOTION by Virginia Chau, Anh Kim Ho for Extension of Time to File a Motion to Remand in response to Notice of Removal; however, the motion is GRANTED insofar as it seeks to supplement the motion to remand within the original 30-day deadline; directing the Plaintiff to file a memorandum of law and any additional exhibits in support of her motion to remand no later than 7/15/2019; Defendants will have fourteen days from the date of Plaintiff's supplemental filings to respond to the motion. Signed by Judge Thomas E. Johnston on 7/9/2019. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (ts)
|
| Filing 13 STATEMENT OF VISITING ATTORNEY from Thomas B. Almy on behalf of Air Cargo Carriers, LLC. Local counsel: Brian J. Moore. Fee $50.00. Receipt # AWVSDC-7309154. (Moore, Brian) |
| Filing 12 REPLY by Virginia Chau, Anh Kim Ho to #10 Response In Opposition,. (Tiano, William) |
| Filing 11 JOINDER by Air Cargo Carriers, LLC in the #10 Response In Opposition. (Poe, Edgar) (Modified on 7/2/2019 to convert event to notice (other)) (kew). |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE by United Parcel Service Co. in opposition to #8 MOTION by Virginia Chau, Anh Kim Ho for Extension of Time to File a Motion to Remand in response to #1 Notice of Removal and #9 MOTION by Virginia Chau, Anh Kim Ho to Remand Case to Circuit Court of Kanawha County. (Moore, Brian) (Modified on 7/1/2019 to add link to #9 motion) (kew). |
| Filing 9 MOTION by Virginia Chau, Anh Kim Ho to Remand Case to Circuit Court of Kanawha County (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3)(Tiano, William) |
| Filing 8 MOTION by Virginia Chau, Anh Kim Ho for Extension of Time to File a Motion to Remand in response to #1 Notice of Removal. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit 1)(Tiano, William) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER TO COMPLAINT ATTACHED TO #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by United Parcel Service Co. (Moore, Brian) (Modified on 6/20/2019 to add link to #1 notice of removal) (kew). |
| Filing 6 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO RULE 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, by Defendant Air Cargo Carriers, LLC (Poe, Edgar) |
| Filing 5 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO RULE 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, by Defendant Air Cargo Carriers, LLC (Poe, Edgar) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER TO COMPLAINT ATTACHED TO #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand by Air Cargo Carriers, LLC. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Poe, Edgar) |
| CASE assigned to Chief Judge Thomas E. Johnston. (klc) |
| Filing 3 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO RULE 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, by Defendant United Parcel Service Co. (Moore, Brian) |
| Filing 2 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Tinsley. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (lca) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by United Parcel Service Co. with summons, complaint and docket sheet from Circuit Court of Kanawha County. Filing Fee $400.00. Receipt #AWVSDC-7281292. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Civil Cover Sheet) (lca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
