Thompson et al v. Altec Industries, Inc. et al
Jill Thompson and William Thompson |
Altec Industries, Inc. and Altec, Inc. |
2:2019cv00583 |
August 8, 2019 |
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Thomas E Johnston |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 4 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO RULE 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, by Defendants Altec Industries, Inc., Altec, Inc. (Williams, Marc) |
Filing 3 ANSWER TO COMPLAINT ATTACHED TO #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Altec Industries, Inc., Altec, Inc. (Williams, Marc) (Modified on 8/15/2019 to add link to #1 notice of removal) (kew). |
CASE assigned to Chief Judge Thomas E. Johnston. (klc) |
Filing 2 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Tinsley. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (mms) (Modified on 8/8/2019 to remove and replace incorrect image) (kew). |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Altec, Inc., Altec Industries, Inc. with summons, complaint and docket sheet from Circuit Court of Kanawha County. Filing Fee $400.00. Receipt #AWVSDC-7343261. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (mms) |
NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re: #2 Standing Order. ERROR: Incorrect image attached. CORRECTION: Incorrect image removed and replaced. (kew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.