Rhodes et al v. King et al
| Travis Rhodes and Timothy E. Rhodes |
| Deputy Sheriff Michael King and Roane County Commission |
| 2:2019cv00626 |
| August 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Thomas E Johnston |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 REPLY by Michael King, Roane County Commission to #14 Response Memorandum In Opposition. (Adkins, Drannon) |
| Filing 14 RESPONSE MEMORANDUM by Timothy E. Rhodes, Travis Rhodes in opposition to #12 MOTION by Michael King, Roane County Commission to Dismiss #4 Amended Complaint. (Adams, Benjamin) |
| Filing 13 MEMORANDUM OF LAW by Michael King, Roane County Commission in support of #12 MOTION by Michael King, Roane County Commission to Dismiss #4 Amended Complaint. (Adkins, Drannon) |
| Filing 12 MOTION by Michael King, Roane County Commission to Dismiss #4 Amended Complaint. (Adkins, Drannon) |
| Filing 11 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO RULE 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, by Defendants Michael King, Roane County Commission (Adkins, Drannon) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER TO #4 Amended Complaint with Jury Demand by Michael King, Roane County Commission. (Adkins, Drannon) (Modified on 9/30/2019 to add jury demand) (kew). |
Filing 9
ORDER AND NOTICE: Rule 12(b) Motions 10/7/2019. Rule 26(f) Meeting 10/21/2019. Last day to file report of Rule 26(f) Meeting 10/28/2019. Telephonic Scheduling Conference at 2:30 PM on 11/1/2019. Entry of Scheduling Order 11/6/2019. Last Day to make Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures 11/15/2019. Signed by Judge Thomas E. Johnston on 9/24/2019. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (kew)
|
| Filing 8 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED by Personal Service for Michael King. Michael King served on 9/9/2019, answer due 9/30/2019. Summons served on Michael King. (Adams, Benjamin) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED for Roane County Commission, Roane County Commission served on 9/9/2019, answer due 9/30/2019. (Adams, Benjamin) |
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Michael King, Roane County Commission, re: #4 Amended Complaint. Summons returnable 21 days. Instructions to Counsel: This is your electronic summons. Please print as many copies of the Summons and Complaint as are necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. See Proof of Service page of this Summons form for filing a return of service if required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l). (Attachment: #1 Summons as to Michael King) (kew) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS SUBMITTED by Timothy E. Rhodes, Travis Rhodes for Michael King, Roane County Commission, re: #4 Amended Complaint. (Attachment: #1 Summons submitted as to Michael King)(Adams, Benjamin) (Modified on 9/4/2019 to add link to #4 amended complaint) (kew). |
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT by Timothy E. Rhodes, Travis Rhodes against Michael King, Roane County Commission. (ts) |
| Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Tinsley. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (ts) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT. Filing Fee $400.00. Receipt # AWVSDC-7367201. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (ts) |
| CASE assigned to Chief Judge Thomas E. Johnston. (klc) |
| Filing 1 SUMMONS SUBMITTED by Travis Rhodes for Michael King, Roane County Commission, re: #1 Complaint. (Attachment: #1 Summons submitted as to Roane County Commission)(Adams, Benjamin) (Modified on 8/30/2019 to add link to #2 complaint) (kew). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
