Workman et al v. J.W. Ebert Corporation
Plaintiff: Rebecca Workman and Dakota S. Workman
Defendant: J.W. Ebert Corporation
Case Number: 2:2019cv00749
Filed: October 15, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Presiding Judge: John T Copenhaver
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 13, 2019 Filing 7 RULE 26(f) REPORT OF PLANNING MEETING by J.W. Ebert Corporation. (O'Brien, Melvin)
November 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER AND NOTICE: Rule 12(b) Motions 12/4/2019. Rule 26(f) Meeting 12/16/2019. Last day to file report of Rule 26(f) Meeting 12/23/2019. Scheduling Conference at 1:30 PM on 1/3/2020 in Charleston. Entry of Scheduling Order 1/10/2020. Last Day to make Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures 1/17/2020. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 11/14/2019. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (kew)
November 13, 2019 Filing 5 ANSWER TO #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by J.W. Ebert Corporation. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(O'Brien, Melvin) (Modified on 11/14/2019 to add jury demand) (kew).
October 28, 2019 Filing 4 SUMMONS ACCEPTED FOR SERVICE BY SECRETARY OF STATE on 10/23/2019 as to J.W. Ebert Corporation. Certified Mail Number: 92148901125134100002601758. (ts)
October 15, 2019 CASE assigned to Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. (klc)
October 15, 2019 Filing 3 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to J.W. Ebert Corporation, re: #1 Complaint. Summons returnable 21 days. Instructions to Counsel: This is your electronic summons. Please print as many copies of the Summons and Complaint as are necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. See Proof of Service page of this Summons form for filing a return of service if required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l). (mms)
October 15, 2019 Filing 2 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Tinsley. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (mms)
October 15, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing Fee $400.00. Receipt # AWVSDC-7413986. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (mms)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Workman et al v. J.W. Ebert Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rebecca Workman
Represented By: Bernard E. Layne, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dakota S. Workman
Represented By: Bernard E. Layne, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J.W. Ebert Corporation
Represented By: BreiAnne R. Varner
Represented By: Melvin F. O'Brien
Represented By: Michelle D. Baldwin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?