Wood v. United States Department of Agriculture Rural Housing Service
| Denise Wood |
| United States Department of Agriculture Rural Housing Service |
| 2:2019cv00897 |
| December 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Joseph R Goodwin |
| Contract: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER AND NOTICE: Rule 12(b) Motions 3/2/2020. Rule 26(f) Meeting 3/16/2020. Last day to file report of Rule 26(f) Meeting 3/23/2020. Scheduling Conference at 1:00 p.m. on 4/6/2020 in Charleston. Entry of Scheduling Order 4/13/2020. Last Day to make Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures 4/20/2020. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 2/11/2020. (cc: counsel of record and any unrepresented parties) (mms)
|
| Filing 6 MEMORANDUM by United States Department of Agriculture Rural Housing Service in support of #4 MOTION by United States Department of Agriculture Rural Housing Service to Dismiss #1 Complaint. (Arthur, Christopher) |
| Filing 5 EXHIBIT 1 by United States Department of Agriculture Rural Housing Service in support of #4 MOTION by United States Department of Agriculture Rural Housing Service to Dismiss With Prejudice. (Arthur, Christopher) |
| Filing 4 MOTION by United States Department of Agriculture Rural Housing Service to Dismiss #1 Complaint. (Arthur, Christopher) (Modified on 2/5/2020 to add link to #1 complaint) (kew). |
| Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Tinsley. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc) |
| CASE assigned to Judge Joseph R. Goodwin. (klc) |
| Filing 2 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to United States Department of Agriculture Rural Housing Service, re: #1 Complaint. Summons returnable 60 days. Instructions to Counsel: This is your electronic summons. Please print as many copies of the Summons and Complaint as are necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. See Proof of Service page of this Summons form for filing a return of service if required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l). (kew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing Fee $400.00. Receipt # AWVSDC-7487579. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons as to United States Department of Agriculture Rural Housing Service, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (kew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Wood v. United States Department of Agriculture Rural Housing Service | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Denise Wood | |
| Represented By: | Bren J. Pomponio |
| Represented By: | Sarah K. Brown |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States Department of Agriculture Rural Housing Service | |
| Represented By: | Christopher R. Arthur |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
