Hager v. Knox et al
Nicole Hager |
Counselor Knox, John Doe and The West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation |
2:2020cv00020 |
January 9, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Thomas E Johnston |
Prisoner - (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 ANSWER TO #14 Amended Complaint with Jury Demand by West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation. (Murray, William) (Modified on 3/3/2020 to add jury demand) (kew). |
Filing 15 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Nicole Hager for First Set of Discovery Requests to West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation. (Woelfel, Michael) |
Filing 14 AMENDED COMPLAINT by Nicole Hager against John Doe, Knox, West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation (ts) |
Filing 13 RULE 26(f) REPORT OF PLANNING MEETING by West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Nicole Hager. (Murray, William) (Modified on 2/19/2020 to add party filer) (kew). |
Filing 12 RESPONSE by Nicole Hager re: #3 MOTION by West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation for More Definite Statement Responses (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Pt 1, #2 Exhibit A Pt 2)(Woelfel, Michael) |
Filing 11 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ATTORNEY INFORMATION by William E. Murray updating name and/or firm information on behalf of West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation. (Murray, William) |
Filing 10 ORDER granting the #3 Motion for More Definite Statement, the #5 Motion to Amend, and the #7 Motion to Extend Time; Plaintiff is required to serve Defendant Knox by 4/30/2020. Signed by Judge Thomas E. Johnston on 2/5/2020. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (kew) |
Filing 9 PRELIMINARY RESPONSE by Nicole Hager to #3 MOTION by West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation for More Definite Statement Responses. (Woelfel, Michael) |
Filing 8 MEMORANDUM by Nicole Hager in support of #7 MOTION by Nicole Hager to Extend Time Limit for Service of Process per Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 4(m). (Woelfel, Michael) |
Filing 7 MOTION by Nicole Hager to Extend Time Limit for Service of Process per Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 4(m) (Woelfel, Michael) |
Filing 6 MEMORANDUM by Nicole Hager in support of #5 MOTION by Nicole Hager for Leave to File Amended Complaint. (Woelfel, Michael) |
Filing 5 MOTION by Nicole Hager for Leave to File Amended Complaint (Woelfel, Michael) |
Filing 4 ORDER AND NOTICE: Rule 12(b) Motions 2/24/2020. Rule 26(f) Meeting 3/9/2020. Last day to file report of Rule 26(f) Meeting 3/16/2020. Telephonic Scheduling Conference at 2:00 PM on 3/23/2020. Entry of Scheduling Order 3/30/2020. Last Day to make Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures 4/6/2020. Signed by Judge Thomas E. Johnston on 1/27/2020. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (ts) |
Filing 3 MOTION by West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation for More Definite Statement Responses. (Murray, William) |
Filing 2 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Tinsley. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc) |
CASE assigned to Chief Judge Thomas E. Johnston. (klc) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation with summons, complaint and docket sheet from Circuit Court of Kanawha County. Filing Fee $400.00. Receipt #AWVSDC-7508448. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (ts) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.