Marcum v. Hayhurst
Jeremy A. Marcum |
Dylan Hayhurst |
2:2020cv00381 |
June 30, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
John T Copenhaver |
Dwane L Tinsley |
Prisoner - (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER AND NOTICE granting #5 APPLICATION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees or Costs; directing that the plaintiff shall pay the full amount of the filing fee of $350.00 by payments sent to the Clerk of the Court by the prison where the plaintiff is incarcerated; the plaintiff is required to make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month's income credited to his prisoner account, until he has paid the total filing fee of $350.00; the correctional facility where the plaintiff is incarcerated is requested, when the plaintiff's prisoner account exceeds the sum of $10.00, to forward monthly payments to the Clerk of this Court, with each payment being a sum which equals 20 percent of the preceding month's income credited to the plaintiff's prisoner account. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley on 6/30/2020. (cc: plaintiff; inmate accounts) (kew) |
Filing 7 CONSENT TO COLLECTION OF FEES FROM TRUST ACCOUNT by Jeremy A. Marcum (ts) (Modified on 6/18/2020 to replace image in color) (ts). |
Filing 6 AUTHORIZATION TO RELEASE INSTITUTIONAL ACCOUNT INFORMATION by Jeremy A. Marcum (Attachment: #1 Resident Transaction Detail, #2 Envelope) (ts) (Modified on 6/18/2020 to replace image in color and to add envelope) (ts). |
Filing 5 APPLICATION by Jeremy A. Marcum to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees or Costs. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley. (ts) (Modified on 6/18/2020 to replace image in color) (ts). |
Filing 4 ORDER AND NOTICE directing that the plaintiff shall either pay the $400 filing fee or file an Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs by 6/30/2020. Further directing that the #2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel is denied without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley on 6/5/2020. (cc: plaintiff) (lca) |
Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc) |
CASE assigned to Senior District Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. (klc) |
Filing 2 MOTION by Jeremy A. Marcum for Appointment of Counsel. (lca) |
Filing 1 VERIFIED COMPLAINT. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Affidavit, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Envelope) (lca). (Modified on 7/22/2020 to replace incomplete attachment 2 with complete attachment) (lca). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Marcum v. Hayhurst | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jeremy A. Marcum | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Dylan Hayhurst | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.