Lovejoy v. Jackson Resources Company
| Rita Lovejoy |
| Jackson Resources Company |
| 2:2020cv00537 |
| August 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Joseph R Goodwin |
| Environmental Matters |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 9607 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ATTORNEY INFORMATION by Robert M. Stonestreet appearing on behalf of Jackson Resources Company. (Stonestreet, Robert)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER AND NOTICE: Rule 12(b) Motions 10/27/2020. Rule 26(f) Meeting 11/9/2020. Last day to file report of Rule 26(f) Meeting 11/16/2020. Scheduling Conference at 09:00 AM on 11/30/2020 in Charleston. Entry of Scheduling Order 12/7/2020. Last Day to make Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures 12/14/2020. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 10/6/2020. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (mk)
|
|
Filing 7
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO RULE 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, by Defendant Jackson Resources Company (Power, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 6
ANSWER TO #1 Complaint by Jackson Resources Company.(Power, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 5
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO #1 COMPLAINT to 10/5/2020 by Jackson Resources Company, Rita Lovejoy. (Casto, Matthew) (Modified on 9/3/2020 to add link to #1 complaint and to add party filer) (kew).
|
|
Filing 4
SUMMONS ACCEPTED FOR SERVICE BY SECRETARY OF STATE on 8/14/2020 as to Jackson Resources Company. Certified Mail Number: 921489011251341000002756083. (ts)
|
|
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Tinsley. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc)
|
|
CASE assigned to Judge Joseph R. Goodwin. (klc)
|
|
Filing 2
ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Jackson Resources Company, re: #1 Complaint. Summons returnable 21 days. Instructions to Counsel: This is your electronic summons. Please print as many copies of the Summons and Complaint as are necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. See Proof of Service page of this Summons form for filing a return of service if required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l). (kew)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT. Filing Fee $400.00. Receipt # AWVSDC-7701139. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons as to Jackson Resources Company, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (kew)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lovejoy v. Jackson Resources Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Jackson Resources Company | |
| Represented By: | Matthew S. Casto |
| Represented By: | Robert M. Stonestreet |
| Represented By: | Christopher B. Power |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Rita Lovejoy | |
| Represented By: | Michael O. Callaghan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
