Mattingly v. Sneed et al
John Joseph Mattingly, II |
CO Bryer Lynch, CO Robert Wooding, Sgt. Matthew Starcher and CO John Sneed |
2:2020cv00622 |
September 22, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Irene C Berger |
Prisoner - (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 5 RULE 26(f) REPORT OF PLANNING MEETING by Bryer Lynch, John Sneed, Matthew Starcher, Robert Wooding, John Joseph Mattingly, II. (Fuller, John) (Modified on 11/3/2020 to add party filer) (ts). |
|
Filing 3 ANSWER TO COMPLAINT ATTACHED TO #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand by Bryer Lynch, John Sneed, Matthew Starcher, Robert Wooding. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Fuller, John) (Modified on 9/24/2020 to add link to #1 notice of removal and to add jury demand) (kew). |
Filing 2 ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER FOR ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES OF CIVIL ACTIONS ASSIGNED TO JUDGE IRENE C. BERGER ENTERED NOVEMBER 12, 2019. This matter referred to Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn for Discovery. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc) |
CASE assigned to Judge Irene C. Berger. (klc) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by John Joseph Mattingly, II with summons, complaint and docket sheet from Circuit Court of Kanawha County. Filing Fee $400.00. Receipt #AWVSDC-7744878. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (ts) (Modified on 9/23/2020 to flatten attachment #4)(ts). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.