Martin v. Saul
| Daniel Robert Martin |
| Andrew Saul |
| 2:2020cv00772 |
| November 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Omar J Aboulhosn |
| Joseph R Goodwin |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer. The defendant shall file an answer and certified copy of the transcript by 4/5/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 1/28/2021. (cc: counsel of record) (lca)
|
| Filing 7 UNOPPOSED MOTION by Andrew Saul to Extend Time to File Answer to #2 Complaint and to file the Electronic Record (Attachment: #1 Declaration) Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn.(Neil, Gregory) |
| Filing 6 RETURN RECEIPT CARD received from Commissioner of Social Security re: #2 Complaint. Andrew Saul served on 12/04/2020, answer due 3/04/2020. Return Receipt Card for Attorney General signed on 12/06/2020. Return Receipt Card for Commissioner of Social Security signed on 12/07/2020. (Pence, David) (Modified on 12/18/2020 to remove link to #5 electronic summons issued and to set answer date) (ts). |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Andrew Saul, re: #2 Complaint. Summons returnable 60 days. Instructions to Counsel: This is your electronic summons. Please print as many copies of the Summons and Complaint as are necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. See Proof of Service page of this Summons form for filing a return of service if required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l). (lca) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER AND NOTICE GRANTING IN FORMA PAUPERIS directing that the #1 APPLICATION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees or Costs is granted. The Clerk of Court shall issue the summons(es), and the plaintiff shall serve the summons(es) and complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 11/30/2020. (cc: counsel of record) (lca)
|
| Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (ts) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (lca) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION by Daniel Robert Martin to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees or Costs. (Attachment: #1 Proposed Order) (lca) |
| CASE assigned to Judge Joseph R. Goodwin. (ts) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Martin v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew Saul | |
| Represented By: | Gregory P. Neil |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Daniel Robert Martin | |
| Represented By: | David Roger Pence |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
