Douglas v. Mr. Heater et al
| Martin Douglas |
| Rural King and Mr. Heater |
| 2:2020cv00856 |
| December 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Thomas E Johnston |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER advising of call-in information for the telephonic scheduling conference set for 2/16/2021 at 2:30 p.m. Signed by Judge Thomas E. Johnston on 2/12/2021. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (lca)
|
| Filing 14 REPLY by Mr. Heater, Rural King to #9 Response In Opposition. (Beeson, Craig) |
| Filing 13 RESPONSE by Mr. Heater, Rural King in opposition to #10 MOTION by Martin Douglas to Extend Time to Respond to Defendant's Motion and Court's Deadline (Attachment: #1 Exhibit A)(Beeson, Craig) |
| Filing 12 MOTION by Martin Douglas to Amend Complaint. (Attachments: #1 Amended Complaint, #2 Certificate of Service) (lca) |
| Filing 11 MEMORANDUM OF LAW by Martin Douglas in support of #10 MOTION by Martin Douglas to Extend Time. (lca) |
| Filing 10 MOTION by Martin Douglas to Extend Time to Respond to Defendant's Motion and Court's Deadline. (lca) |
| Filing 9 RESPONSE/REPLY by Martin Douglas in opposition to #3 MOTION by Mr. Heater, Rural King to Dismiss. (lca) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER directing Plaintiff to respond to Defendants' #3 motion to dismiss within 10 days of entry of this Order. Signed by Chief Judge Thomas E. Johnston on 1/21/2021. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (arb)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER AND NOTICE: Rule 12(b) Motions 1/19/2021. Rule 26(f) Meeting 2/2/2021. Last day to file report of Rule 26(f) Meeting 2/9/2021. Scheduling Conference at 02:30 PM on 2/16/2021 in Charleston. Entry of Scheduling Order 2/23/2021. Last Day to make Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures 3/2/2021. Signed by Judge Thomas E. Johnston on 12/28/2020. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (tmr)
|
| NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re: #3 Motion by Mr. Heater, Rural King to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, or, in the Alternative, Motion for More Definite Statement re: Complaint Attached to #1 Notice of Removal. ERROR: Memorandum of Law attached as attachment #1 to Motion. CORRECTION: Memorandum of Law removed and refiled at ECF #4. (ts) |
| Filing 4 MEMORANDUM OF LAW by Mr. Heater, Rural King in support of #3 MOTION by Mr. Heater, Rural King to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, or, in the Alternative, MOTION for More Definite Statement re: Complaint Attached to #1 Notice of Removal (Beeson, Craig) |
| Filing 3 MOTION by Mr. Heater, Rural King to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, or, in the Alternative, MOTION for More Definite Statement re: Complaint Attached to #1 Notice of Removal (Attachment: #2 Exhibit A - Complaint)(Beeson, Craig) (Modified on 12/23/2020 to add link to #1 notice of removal and remove attachment #1, memorandum of law) (ts). |
| Filing 2 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Tinsley. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc) |
| CASE assigned to Chief Judge Thomas E. Johnston. (klc) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Rural King, Mr. Heater with summons, complaint and docket sheet from Circuit Court of Kanawha County. Filing Fee $402.00. Receipt #AWVSDC-7831250. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (lca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
