Courtland Company, Inc. v. Union Carbide Corporation
Plaintiff: The Courtland Company, Inc.
Defendant: Union Carbide Corporation
Case Number: 2:2021cv00101
Filed: February 9, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Presiding Judge: John T Copenhaver
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 35 MEMORANDUM OF LAW by Union Carbide Corporation in support of #34 MOTION by Union Carbide Corporation to Stay (Bello, Patricia)
April 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 34 MOTION by Union Carbide Corporation to Stay (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Bello, Patricia)
April 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 33 RESPONSE by Union Carbide Corporation in support of #31 MOTION by Courtland Company, Inc. to Seal Exhibits C and D to Reply. (Bello, Patricia)
April 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 32 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying #5 APPLICATION by Courtland Company, Inc. for Temporary Restraining Order. Signed by Senior Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 4/5/2021. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (mk)
April 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 31 MOTION by Courtland Company, Inc. to Seal Exhibits C and D to Reply to Response. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit C, #2 Exhibit D)(Callaghan, Michael)
April 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 30 REPLY by Courtland Company, Inc. to #28 Response In Opposition. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A., #2 Exhibit B., #3 Exhibit E., #4 Exhibit F., #5 Exhibit G.)(Callaghan, Michael)
March 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 29 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Courtland Company, Inc. for Interrogatories, Requests for Admission and Request for Production of Documents. (Callaghan, Michael)
March 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 28 RESPONSE by Union Carbide Corporation in opposition to #25 RULE 42 MOTION by The Courtland Company, Inc. for Phased and Consolidated Trial of Related Actions (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Bello, Patricia)
March 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 27 REPLY by Union Carbide Corporation to #26 Response In Opposition. (Bello, Patricia) (Modified on 3/25/2021 to remove link to #23 motion) (ts).
March 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 26 RESPONSE by Courtland Company, Inc. in opposition to #23 MOTION by Union Carbide Corporation to Dismiss With Prejudice re: #1 Complaint (Callaghan, Michael)
March 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 25 RULE 42 MOTION by The Courtland Company, Inc. for Phased and Consolidated Trial of Related Actions. (Callaghan, Michael)
March 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 24 MEMORANDUM OF LAW by Union Carbide Corporation in support of #23 MOTION by Union Carbide Corporation to Dismiss With Prejudice re: #1 Complaint (Bello, Patricia)
March 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 23 MOTION by Union Carbide Corporation to Dismiss With Prejudice re: #1 Complaint. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit A)(Bello, Patricia)
March 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 22 TRO HEARING held by Senior Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 3/2/2021; Court Reporter: Catherine Schutte-Stant. (kew)
March 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 21 TRO HEARING held by Senior Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 3/1/2021; Court Reporter: Catherine Schutte-Stant. (kew)
February 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 19 NOTICE of Intent to Serve Subpoena Upon Brad Wright by Union Carbide Corporation (Attachment: #1 Exhibit A)(Bello, Patricia)
February 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 20 TRO HEARING held by Senior Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 2/26/2021; Court Reporter: Catherine Schutte-Stant. (ts)
February 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 18 RESPONSE by Union Carbide Corporation in opposition to #16 MOTION by Courtland Company, Inc. to Strike the Declaration of Charles H. MacPherson, Jr. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit 1)(Bello, Patricia)
February 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 17 SUPPLEMENT TO RESPONSE by Union Carbide Corporation in opposition to #5 APPLICATION by Courtland Company, Inc. for Temporary Restraining Order (Attachment: #1 Exhibit A)(Bello, Patricia)
February 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 MOTION by Courtland Company, Inc. to Strike the Declaration of Charles H. MacPherson, Jr. (Callaghan, Michael)
February 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 NOTICE of Intent to Serve Subpoena on David Carpenter by Courtland Company, Inc. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit A, David Carpenter Subpoena)(Callaghan, Michael)
February 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 NOTICE of Intent to Serve Subpoena to Jerome Cibrik by Courtland Company, Inc. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit A, Subpoena)(Callaghan, Michael)
February 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 STATEMENT OF VISITING ATTORNEY from Martin A. Shelton on behalf of Union Carbide Corporation. Local counsel: Patricia M. Bello. Fee $50.00. Receipt # AWVSDC-7887414. (Bello, Patricia)
February 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 NOTICE of Intent to Serve Subpoena Upon Ryan Harbison by Courtland Company, Inc. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit A - Subpoena)(Callaghan, Michael)
February 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 STATEMENT OF VISITING ATTORNEY from Michael C. Donovan on behalf of Courtland Company, Inc. Local counsel: Michael O. Callaghan. Fee $50.00. Receipt # AWVSDC-7886645. (Callaghan, Michael)
February 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER directing that a hearing on plaintiff's #5 APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order is set for Friday, 2/26/2021, at 10:00 am in the District Courtroom A, Room 6000 at the Robert C. Byrd United States Courthouse in Charleston, West Virginia, before Senior Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. Signed by Senior Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 2/19/2021. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (msa)
February 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Charles Whittaker Neely on behalf of Courtland Company, Inc. (Neely, Charles)
February 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 REPLY MEMORANDUM by Courtland Company, Inc. to #7 Response In Opposition. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Callaghan, Michael)
February 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 RESPONSE by Union Carbide Corporation in opposition to #5 APPLICATION by Courtland Company, Inc. for Temporary Restraining Order (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Carpenter Declaration, #2 Exhibit MacPherson Declaration, #3 Exhibit DEP Appeal and Order, #4 Exhibit MacPerson Report, #5 Exhibit Truslow Depo Exhibit)(Bello, Patricia)
February 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MEMORANDUM by Courtland Company, Inc. in support of #5 APPLICATION by Courtland Company, Inc. for Temporary Restraining Order. (kew)
February 11, 2021 Opinion or Order NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re: #5 APPLICATION by Courtland Company, Inc. for Temporary Restraining Order. ERROR: Memorandum in Support attached to Application. CORRECTION: Memorandum removed and filed at entry #6. (kew)
February 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 APPLICATION by Courtland Company, Inc. for Temporary Restraining Order (Attachments: #2 Declaration, #3 Proposed Order)(Callaghan, Michael) (Modified on 2/11/2021 to remove memorandum in support (attachment #1) and file at entry #6) (kew).
February 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 STATEMENT OF VISITING ATTORNEY from Thomas Smith on behalf of Courtland Company, Inc. Local counsel: Michael O. Callaghan. Fee $50.00. Receipt # AWVSDC-7876573. (Callaghan, Michael)
February 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Union Carbide Corporation, re: #1 Complaint. Summons returnable 21 days. Instructions to Counsel: This is your electronic summons. Please print as many copies of the Summons and Complaint as are necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. See Proof of Service page of this Summons form for filing a return of service if required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l). (mms)
February 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Tinsley. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc)
February 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing Fee $402.00. Receipt # AWVSDC-7875420. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 to Complaint, #2 Continuation Exhibit 1 to Complaint pages 15-44, #3 Continuation Exhibit 1 to Complaint pages 45-63, #4 Continuation Exhibit 1 to Complaint pages 64-85, #5 Exhibit 2 to Complaint, #6 Proposed Summons as to Union Carbide Corporation, #7 Civil Cover Sheet) (mms)
February 9, 2021 Opinion or Order CASE assigned to Senior Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. (klc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Courtland Company, Inc. v. Union Carbide Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: The Courtland Company, Inc.
Represented By: Michael O. Callaghan
Represented By: Michael C. Donovan
Represented By: Thomas A. Smith
Represented By: Charles Whittaker Neely
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Union Carbide Corporation
Represented By: Matthew A. Nelson
Represented By: Martin A. Shelton
Represented By: Ronald Scott Masterson
Represented By: Patricia M. Bello
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?