United States of America v. Blue Project Organizer et al
| United States of America |
| Blue Project Organizer, $16,350 in United States Currency, Ninety-Six (96) Catalytic Converters and One (1) Large Catalytic Converter |
| 2:2021cv00303 |
| May 17, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Joseph R Goodwin |
| Forfeit/Penalty: Other |
| 77 U.S.C. ยง 7777 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 WARRANT OF ARREST AND NOTICE IN REM ISSUED. Original and 10 copies returned to Christopher R. Arthur; re: #3 Verified Complaint of Forfeiture. (lca) |
| Filing 4 WARRANT OF ARREST AND NOTICE IN REM SUBMITTED by United States of America. (lca) |
| Filing 3 VERIFIED COMPLAINT OF FORFEITURE by United States of America against $16,350 in United States Currency, Blue Project Organizer, Ninety-Six (96) Catalytic Converters, One (1) Large Catalytic Converter. (Attachments: #1 Verification, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (lca) |
| Filing 2 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Tinsley. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc) |
| CASE assigned to Judge Joseph R. Goodwin. (klc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE by United States of America against $16,350 in United States Currency, Blue Project Organizer, Ninety-Six (96) Catalytic Converters, One (1) Large Catalytic Converter. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (lca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
