Doe v. City of Gauley Bridge et al
Plaintiff: Jane Doe
Defendant: The City of Gauley Bridge and Larry Allen Clay, Jr.
Case Number: 2:2021cv00491
Filed: September 1, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Presiding Judge: Thomas E Johnston
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED by Personal Service for City of Gauley Bridge. City of Gauley Bridge served on 10/4/2021, answer due 10/25/2021. Summons served on Penney Brouillard, City Recorder. (Williams, Russell)
October 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MOTION by Jane Doe to Appoint Guardian ad Litem for Larry Allen Clay, Jr. (Williams, Russell)
October 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED for Larry Allen Clay, Jr. Larry Allen Clay, Jr. served on 10/1/2021, answer due 10/22/2021. (Williams, Russell)
September 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED by Personal Service for City of Gauley Bridge. City of Gauley Bridge served on 9/21/2021, answer due 10/12/2021. Summons served on The City of Gauley Bridge c/o Brian Parsons, City Attorney. (Williams, Russell)
September 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to the City of Gauley Bridge, Larry Allen Clay, Jr., re: #1 Complaint. Summons returnable 21 days. Instructions to Counsel: This is your electronic summons. Please print as many copies of the Summons and Complaint as are necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. See Proof of Service page of this Summons form for filing a return of service if required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l). (Attachment: #1 Electronic Summons as to Larry Allen Clay, Jr.) (mfo)
September 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Tinsley. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc)
September 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing Fee $402.00. Receipt # AWVSDC-8024142. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons as to the City of Gauley Bridge, #2 Proposed Summons as to Larry Allen Clay, Jr., #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (mfo) (Modified on 9/2/2021 to correct filing date) (ts).
September 1, 2021 Opinion or Order CASE assigned to Chief Judge Thomas E. Johnston. (klc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Doe v. City of Gauley Bridge et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jane Doe
Represented By: Russell A. Williams
Represented By: Stephen P. New
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The City of Gauley Bridge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Larry Allen Clay, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?