Carder et al v. Hoveround Corporation et al
Cheryl L. Carder, Beverly Ann Tanner, Raymond Glen Tanner and Randy Tanner |
Hoveround Corporation and Curtiss-Wright Controls Integrated Sensing, Inc. |
2:2021cv00511 |
September 10, 2021 |
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Thomas E Johnston |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
MOTION REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley: #11 JOINT MOTION by All Parties for Protective Order, Order Governing the Inadvertent Disclosure of Documents or Other Material, and Setting Deposition Protocol. (kew) |
Filing 11 JOINT MOTION by Curtiss-Wright Controls Integrated Sensing, Inc., Cheryl L. Carder, Beverly Ann Tanner, Raymond Glen Tanner, Randy Tanner, Hoveround Corporation for Protective Order, Order Governing the Inadvertent Disclosure of Documents or Other Material, and Setting Deposition Protocol. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit A)(Bolen, J.) (Modified on 11/2/2021 to add party filers) (kew). |
Filing 10 RULE 26(f) REPORT OF PLANNING MEETING by Cheryl L. Carder, Beverly Ann Tanner, Randy Tanner, Raymond Glen Tanner, Hoveround Corporation, Curtiss-Wright Controls Integrated Sensing, Inc. (Wear, Brent) (Modified on 11/2/2021 to add party filers) (kew). |
Filing 9 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO RULE 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, by Defendant Hoveround Corporation. (kew) |
Filing 8 ANSWER TO COMPLAINT ATTACHED TO #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand by Hoveround Corporation. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Aldridge, Evan) (Modified on 9/27/2021 to remove disclosure (attachment #2) and file at entry #9) (kew). |
NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re: #8 Answer to Complaint. ERROR: Disclosure Statement attached to answer. CORRECTION: Disclosure removed and filed at entry #9. (kew) |
SET ANSWER DEADLINE for Hoveround Corporation to 9/27/2021. (kew) |
Filing 7 STIPULATION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT HOVEROUND CORPORATION TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT ATTACHED TO #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL to 09/27/2021 by Hoveround Corporation, Beverly Ann Tanner, Raymond Glen Tanner, Randy Tanner. (Aldridge, Evan) (Modified on 9/21/2021 to add link to #1 notice of removal and to add party filers) (kew). |
Filing 6 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO RULE 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, by Defendant Curtiss-Wright Controls Integrated Sensing, Inc. (Bolen, J.) |
Filing 5 ANSWER TO COMPLAINT ATTACHED TO #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Curtiss-Wright Controls Integrated Sensing, Inc. (Bolen, J.) (Modified on 9/17/2021 to add link to #1 notice of removal) (kew). |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by William J. Hanna, Evan S. Aldridge on behalf of Hoveround Corporation. (Hanna, William) |
![]() |
Filing 2 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Tinsley. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc) |
CASE assigned to Chief Judge Thomas E. Johnston. (klc) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Curtiss-Wright Controls Integrated Sensing, Inc. with complaint, docket sheet, consent to removal and other miscellaneous documents from Circuit Court of Wood County. Filing Fee $402.00. Receipt #AWVSDC-8029912. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Civil Cover Sheet) (arb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.