Carder et al v. Hoveround Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Cheryl L. Carder, Beverly Ann Tanner, Raymond Glen Tanner and Randy Tanner
Defendant: Hoveround Corporation and Curtiss-Wright Controls Integrated Sensing, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2021cv00511
Filed: September 10, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 pl
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 10, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Curtiss-Wright Controls Integrated Sensing, Inc. with complaint, miscellaneous documents, consent to removal and docket sheet from Circuit Court of Wood County. Filing Fee $402.00. Receipt #AWVSDC-8029912. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Civil Cover Sheet) (arb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carder et al v. Hoveround Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cheryl L. Carder
Represented By: Brent E. Wear
Represented By: Clayton J. Fitzsimmons
Represented By: David A. Sims
Represented By: Mark A. Colantonio
Represented By: Robert P. Fitzsimmons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Beverly Ann Tanner
Represented By: Brent E. Wear
Represented By: Clayton J. Fitzsimmons
Represented By: David A. Sims
Represented By: Mark A. Colantonio
Represented By: Robert P. Fitzsimmons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Raymond Glen Tanner
Represented By: Brent E. Wear
Represented By: Clayton J. Fitzsimmons
Represented By: David A. Sims
Represented By: Mark A. Colantonio
Represented By: Robert P. Fitzsimmons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Randy Tanner
Represented By: Mark A. Colantonio
Represented By: Robert P. Fitzsimmons
Represented By: Brent E. Wear
Represented By: Clayton J. Fitzsimmons
Represented By: David A. Sims
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hoveround Corporation
Represented By: Ashley Marie Kral
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Curtiss-Wright Controls Integrated Sensing, Inc.
Represented By: Ellen M. Jones
Represented By: J. David Bolen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?