Boone County Commission et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
| Boone County Commission, Cabell County Commission, City of Vienna, West Virginia, Fayette County Commission, Greenbrier County Commission, Kanawha County Commission, Logan County Commission and Wayne County Commission |
| McKinsey and Company, Inc. |
| 2:2021cv00613 |
| November 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Thomas E Johnston |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-21) JUDICIAL PANEL ON MDL: certified copy from the Northern District of California transferring this action to the USDC/CAND for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407. Signed by John W. Nichols, Clerk of the Panel on 1/20/2022. (cc: attys) (kew) |
| Filing 3 NOTIFICATION FROM JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION re: Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-21), MDL 2996. (kew) |
| Filing 2 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Tinsley. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc) |
| CASE assigned to Chief Judge Thomas E. Johnston. (klc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing Fee $402.00. Receipt # AWVSDC-8084559. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (lca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
