Wells v. City of Charleston
| Kandance Wells |
| City of Charleston |
| 2:2022cv00040 |
| January 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Irene C Berger |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION proposing that the District Court deny #1 APPLICATION by Kandance Wells to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees or Costs, dismiss #2 Complaint and remove this matter from the Court's docket. This case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn. If the PF&R was served electronically, Objections are due by 3/21/2022. If the PF&R was served by mail, Objections are due by 3/24/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 3/7/2022. (cc: Plaintiff) (tmr)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER directing the Plaintiff to amend her #2 Complaint by 2/25/2022 and the Clerk to send Plaintiff a copy of a form Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 1/26/2022. (cc: Plaintiff) (lca)
|
|
Filing 5
CLERK'S ORDER. For reasons appearing to the court, the referral this civil action for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition is transferred from Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley to Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn. Signed by Clerk of Court Rory L. Perry II on 1/26/2022. (cc: Magistrate Judge Tinsley; Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn; counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (klc)
|
|
Filing 4
CLERK'S ORDER. For reasons appearing to the court, this action is reassigned from Judge Joseph R. Goodwin to Judge Irene C. Berger. Signed by Clerk of Court Rory L. Perry II on 1/25/2022. (cc: Judge Goodwin; Judge Berger; counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (klc)
|
|
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc) (Modified on 1/26/2022 to note transfer from Magistrate Judge Tinsley to Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition pursuant to #5 Clerk's Order.)(klc).
|
|
CASE assigned to Judge Joseph R. Goodwin. (klc)
|
|
Filing 2
COMPLAINT. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Proposed USM Form, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Envelope) (lca)
|
|
Filing 1
APPLICATION by Kandance Wells to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees and Costs. (lca)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Wells v. City of Charleston | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kandance Wells | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: City of Charleston | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
