Martin v. United States of America
| Brandi Martin |
| United States of America |
| 2:2022cv00045 |
| January 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Cheryl A Eifert |
| David A Faber |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 78
ORDER directing that movant shall have 60 days after service of the #77 Response In Opposition to file a reply. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 3/22/2022. (cc: Movant, counsel of record) (lca)
|
|
Filing 77
RESPONSE by United States of America in opposition to #72 MOTION by Brandi Martin to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 2255. Cross Reference Criminal Case Number 2:19-cr-209. (Hamner, Louie)
|
|
Filing 76
LETTER to Court, from Brandi Martin dated 1/25/2022, re: #72 MOTION by Brandi Martin to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 2255. (mk)
|
|
Filing 75
ORDER as to Brandi Martin; Directing Government to respond to #72 MOTION by Brandi Martin to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 2255 within 60 days of the entry of this order; directing government to file the plea hearing and/or sentencing hearing transcripts; Movant may, if she wishes, file a reply to the answer of the United States within 60 days after service by the United States. Cross Reference Criminal Case Number 2:19-cr-00209. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 1/27/2022. (cc: Judge, USA, movant) (tmr)
|
|
Filing 74
CLERK'S NOTICE OF FILING OF 2255 MOTION by Brandi Martin to U. S. Attorney with copy to Movant. (lca)
|
|
Filing 73
STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: Judge Faber; Magistrate Judge Eifert; Petitioner; USA; USM; USP) Cross Reference Criminal Number 2:19-cr-00209. (klc)
|
|
Filing 72
MOTION by Brandi Martin to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 2255. Cross Reference Criminal Case Number 2:19-cr-209. (lca)
|
|
CASE assigned to Senior Judge David A. Faber. (klc)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Martin v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Brandi Martin | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Louie Alexander Hamner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
