Persinger et al v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
| Robin Elizabeth Persinger, Billy Joe Persinger, Robin Persinger and Johnnie Persinger |
| Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada and United States Branch of the Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada |
| 2:2022cv00126 |
| March 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Irene C Berger |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| 77 U.S.C. ยง 7777 Civil Shell Case Opening |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER OF DISMISSAL directing this matter is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 4/29/2022. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (lca)
|
| Filing 10 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL With Prejudice by Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada, Robin Elizabeth Persinger, Billy Joe Persinger, Robin Persinger, Johnnie Persinger. (Attachment: #1 Proposed Order)(Mathisen, Eric) (Modified on 5/2/2022 to add party filers) (kew). |
| Filing 9 ANSWER TO COMPLAINT ATTACHED TO #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand by Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada. (Mathisen, Eric) (Modified on 4/13/2022 to add jury demand) (kew). |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 MOTION by Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada for Extension of Time to File Administrative Record; and further granting a three-week extension of time from 4/8/2022 to 4/29/2022 to file the Administrative Record. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 4/11/2022. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (mfo)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION by Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada for Extension of Time to File Administrative Record. (Attachment: #1 Proposed Order)(Mathisen, Eric) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER directing that Defendant is granted a 28-day extension of time to respond to the Complaint, to and including 4/12/2022. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 3/16/2022. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (btm)
|
| Filing 5 STATEMENT OF VISITING ATTORNEY from Eric P. Mathisen on behalf of Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada. Local counsel: Stephen M. Fowler. Fee $50.00. Receipt # AWVSDC-8151321. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit)(Fowler, Stephen) |
| Filing 4 MOTION by Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint Attached to #1 Notice of Removal. (Attachment: #1 Proposed Order) (Fowler, Stephen) (Modified on 3/14/2022 to add link to #1 notice of removal) (kew). |
|
Filing 3
SCHEDULING ORDER directing that this case shall proceed as follows: the parties are to file the administrative record by 4/8/2022; if any party wishes to engage in discovery, a motion seeking discovery must be filed by 4/22/2022; the parties shall file any stipulations that may assist the Court in resolving the case by 4/29/2022; cross-motions for summary judgment shall be filed by 6/3/2022. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 3/11/2022. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (lca)
|
| Filing 2 ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER FOR ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES OF CIVIL ACTIONS ASSIGNED TO JUDGE IRENE C. BERGER ENTERED NOVEMBER 12, 2019. This matter referred to Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn for Discovery. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada with summons, complaint, docket sheet and other miscellaneous documents from the Circuit Court of Nicholas County. Filing Fee $402.00. Receipt #AWVSDC-8146543. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Circuit Court Docket Sheet, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (mfo) |
| CASE assigned to Judge Irene C. Berger. (klc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
