Jones v. P.S. Management, Inc.
| Victory Ramey Jones |
| P.S. Management, Inc. |
| 2:2022cv00128 |
| March 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Thomas E Johnston |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER directing that the #6 Joint Stipulation is GRANTED; the Collective Action Claim is DISMISSED; the Individual Claim shall be submitted to final, binding arbitration pursuant to the Arbitration Agreement between Plaintiff and Defendant; all proceeding in this case are STAYED pending arbitration of the Individual Claim; the parties are directed to file a joint report of the status of the arbitration within 30 days of the award of other resolution therefore; and directing the Clerk to remove this case from the Court's active docket. Signed by Judge Thomas E. Johnston on 4/21/2022. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (msa)
|
| Filing 6 JOINT STIPULATION by P.S. Management, Inc., Victory Ramey Jones. (Attachment: #1 Proposed Order)(Capito, Katherine) (Modified on 4/15/2022 to add party filer) (kew). |
| Filing 5 MEMORANDUM by P.S. Management, Inc. in support of #4 MOTION by P.S. Management, Inc. to Compel Arbitration and Stay or Dismiss #1 Complaint. (Capito, Katherine) |
| Filing 4 MOTION by P.S. Management, Inc. to Compel Arbitration and Stay or Dismiss #1 Complaint. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Proposed Order)(Capito, Katherine) (Modified on 4/1/2022 to add link to #1 complaint) (kew). |
| Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Tinsley. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc) |
| CASE assigned to Chief Judge Thomas E. Johnston. (klc) |
| Filing 2 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to P.S. Management, Inc., re: #1 Original Complaint - Collective Action. Summons returnable 21 days. Instructions to Counsel: This is your electronic summons. Please print as many copies of the Summons and Complaint as are necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. See Proof of Service page of this Summons form for filing a return of service if required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l). (klc) |
| Filing 1 ORIGINAL COMPLAINT - COLLECTIVE ACTION. Filing Fee $402.00. Receipt # AWVSDC-814751. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons as to P.S. Management, Inc., #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (klc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jones v. P.S. Management, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Victory Ramey Jones | |
| Represented By: | Rodney Arthur Smith |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: P.S. Management, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Alex J. Zurbuch |
| Represented By: | Katherine B. Capito |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
