Poling v. Kijakazi
Plaintiff: Michael Jay Poling
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Case Number: 2:2022cv00233
Filed: May 25, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Presiding Judge: Cheryl A Eifert
Referring Judge: Joseph R Goodwin
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED by Michael Jay Poling for service upon Kilolo Kijakazi, Kilolo Kijakazi served on 6/13/2022, answer due 8/12/2022. Person Served: Clerk. Return Receipt Card for Attorney General signed on 6/16/2022. Return Receipt Card for Commissioner of Social Security signed on 6/14/2022. (Gillikin, Robert)
May 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Kilolo Kijakazi, re: #2 Complaint. Summons returnable 60 days. Instructions to Counsel: This is your electronic summons. Please print as many copies of the Summons and Complaint as are necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. See Proof of Service page of this Summons form for filing a return of service if required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l). (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, #2 Summons Issued as to U.S. Attorney for the S.D.W.V.) (kew)
May 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER AND NOTICE granting #1 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees or Costs; the Clerk is directed to issue the summonses; the plaintiff shall serve the summonses and Complaint; directing that any recovery obtained in this action is to be paid to the Clerk of the Court, who will pay all unpaid costs and fees taxed against the plaintiff and pay the balance to the plaintiff and his attorney. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 5/25/2022. (cc: counsel of record) (kew)
May 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc)
May 22, 2022 Opinion or Order CASE assigned to Judge Joseph R. Goodwin. (klc)
May 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 COMPLAINT. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons as to the Commissioner of Social Security, #2 Proposed Summons as to the Attorney General, #3 Proposed Summons as to the United States Attorney, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (klc)
May 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 APPLICATION by Michael Jay Poling to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees or Costs. (klc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Poling v. Kijakazi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Jay Poling
Represented By: Robert W. Gillikin, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Represented By: Nora R. Koch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?