Wise v. Kijakazi
Plaintiff: Sarah Elizabeth Wise
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Case Number: 2:2022cv00456
Filed: October 20, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Presiding Judge: Irene C Berger
Referring Judge: Cheryl A Eifert
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED by Sarah Elizabeth Wise for service upon Kilolo Kijakazi, re: #2 Complaint . Kilolo Kijakazi served on 11/14/2022, answer due 1/13/2023. Return Receipt Card for Attorney General signed on 11/16/2022. Return Receipt Card for Commissioner of Social Security signed on 11/15/2022. (Parker, Robert) (Modified on 12/12/2022 to add link to #2 complaint) (kew).
November 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Robert J. Parker on behalf of Sarah Elizabeth Wise. (Parker, Robert)
October 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Kilolo Kijakazi, re: #2 Complaint. Summons returnable 60 days. Instructions to Counsel: This is your electronic summons. Please print as many copies of the Summons and Complaint as are necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. See Proof of Service page of this Summons form for filing a return of service if required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l). (msa)
October 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER AND NOTICE ALLOWING PLAINTIFF TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF COSTS AND FEES granting the #1 APPLICATION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees or Costs; the Clerk of the Court shall issue the summonses; plaintiff shall serve the summonses and Complaint pursuant to Rule 4, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 10/20/2022. (cc: counsel of record) (msa)
October 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc)
October 18, 2022 Opinion or Order CASE assigned to Judge Irene C. Berger. (klc)
October 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO RULE 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, by Plaintiff Sarah Elizabeth Wise. (kew)
October 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 COMPLAINT. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (kew)
October 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 APPLICATION by Sarah Elizabeth Wise to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees or Costs. (kew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wise v. Kijakazi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sarah Elizabeth Wise
Represented By: Jan Dils
Represented By: Robert J. Parker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Represented By: Nora R. Koch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?