Wentz v. Ames et al
Charles Michael Wentz |
Superintendent Donald Ames, Asso. Superintendent Jonathan Frame, Major Josh Ward, Jane Doe, John Doe and Unknown Defendants |
2:2022cv00528 |
November 17, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Omar J Aboulhosn |
Irene C Berger |
Prisoner - (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER that Plaintiff's Exhibits to the #2 Complaint be filed under seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 11/18/2022. (cc: Plaintiff, counsel of record) (lca) |
Filing 4 ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER FOR ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES OF CIVIL ACTIONS ASSIGNED TO JUDGE IRENE C. BERGER ENTERED NOVEMBER 12, 2019. This matter referred to Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn for Proposed Findings & Recommendations. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc) |
CASE assigned to Judge Irene C. Berger. (klc) |
Filing 3 AUTHORIZATION TO RELEASE INSTITUTIONAL ACCOUNT INFORMATION AND TO PAY FILING FEE by Charles Michael Wentz. (Attachment: #1 Resident Activity Report) (btm) (Modified on 11/21/2022 to remove blank page) (ts). |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Envelope) (btm) (Modified on 11/18/2022 to seal exhibits pursuant to the #5 Order) (lca). |
Filing 1 APPLICATION by Charles Michael Wentz to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees and Costs. (btm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.