Honea et al v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company et al
| Blaine Honea and Katherine Honea |
| E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company and The Chemours Company |
| 2:2022cv00568 |
| December 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Thomas E Johnston |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 CONFIRMATION from Southern District of Ohio that the case has been opened in that district as 2:23-cv-00413, filed 01/25/2023. (kew) |
| Filing 4 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-123) JUDICIAL PANEL ON MDL: certified copy from the Southern District of Ohio transferring this action to the USDC/OHSD for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407. Signed by John W. Nichols Clerk of the Panel on 12/21/2023. (cc: attys) (kew) |
| Filing 3 NOTIFICATION FROM JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION re: Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-123), MDL 2433. (kew) |
| Filing 2 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Tinsley. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc) |
| CASE assigned to Chief Judge Thomas E. Johnston. (klc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing Fee $402.00. Receipt # AWVSDC-8324096. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (kew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
