Lowe v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
Plaintiff: Daron Kenton Lowe
Defendant: Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2023cv00048
Filed: January 19, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Presiding Judge: John T Copenhaver
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 14, 2023 Filing 8 SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO #1 COMPLAINT to 4/14/2023 by Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Daron Kenton Lowe. (Cardi, Michael) (Modified on 3/15/2023 to add link to #1 complaint and to add party filer) (kew).
February 14, 2023 Filing 7 STATEMENT OF VISITING ATTORNEY from Stephen C. Scott on behalf of Experian Information Solutions, Inc. Local counsel: Ashley Hardesty Odell. Fee $50.00. Receipt # AWVSDC-8365580. (Odell, Ashley)
February 13, 2023 Filing 6 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO #1 COMPLAINT to 3/15/2023 by Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Daron Kenton Lowe. (Cardi, Michael) (Modified on 2/14/2023 to add link to #1 complaint and to add party filer) (kew).
January 27, 2023 Filing 5 SUMMONS ACCEPTED FOR SERVICE BY SECRETARY OF STATE on 1/23/2023 as to Experian Information Solutions, Inc. Certified Mail Number: 92148901125134100003728477. (mfo)
January 27, 2023 Filing 4 STATEMENT OF VISITING ATTORNEY from Robert S. Sola on behalf of Daron Kenton Lowe. Local counsel: Kristina Thomas Whiteaker. Fee $50.00. Receipt # AWVSDC-8352952. (Whiteaker, Kristina)
January 20, 2023 Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Tinsley. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc)
January 19, 2023 CASE assigned to Senior Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. (klc)
January 19, 2023 Filing 2 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Experian Information Solutions, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Summons returnable 21 days. Instructions to Counsel: This is your electronic summons. Please print as many copies of the Summons and Complaint as are necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. See Proof of Service page of this Summons form for filing a return of service if required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l). (mfo)
January 19, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing Fee $402.00. Receipt # AWVSDC-8347555. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons as to Experian Information Solutions, Inc., #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (mfo)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lowe v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daron Kenton Lowe
Represented By: Kristina Thomas Whiteaker
Represented By: Robert S. Sola
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
Represented By: Michael C. Cardi
Represented By: Stephen Clarence Scott
Represented By: Ashley Hardesty Odell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?