Sanger v. Dodrill et al
| Jeremy Sanger |
| Brandon Dodrill, Tyler Hogan, City of Oak Hill and The City of Oak Hill |
| 2:2023cv00069 |
| January 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Irene C Berger |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER denying Defendants' #10 Motion to Stay Pending Ruling on Their Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 3/15/2023. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (btm)
|
|
Filing 11
MEMORANDUM OF LAW by City of Oak Hill, Brandon Dodrill, Tyler Hogan in support of #10 MOTION by City of Oak Hill, Brandon Dodrill, Tyler Hogan to Stay Pending Ruling on #8 MOTION by City of Oak Hill, Brandon Dodrill, Tyler Hogan to Dismiss #1 Complaint. (Williams, Chip)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION by City of Oak Hill, Brandon Dodrill, Tyler Hogan to Stay Pending Ruling on #8 MOTION by City of Oak Hill, Brandon Dodrill, Tyler Hogan to Dismiss #1 Complaint. (Williams, Chip) (Modified on 3/15/2023 to add link to #8 motion) (kew).
|
|
Filing 9
MEMORANDUM OF LAW by City of Oak Hill, Brandon Dodrill, Tyler Hogan in support of #8 MOTION by City of Oak Hill, Brandon Dodrill, Tyler Hogan to Dismiss #1 Complaint. (Williams, Chip)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION by City of Oak Hill, Brandon Dodrill, Tyler Hogan to Dismiss #1 Complaint. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(Williams, Chip) (Modified on 3/15/2023 to add link to #1 complaint) (kew).
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Timothy D. Houston on behalf of Jeremy Sanger. (Houston, Timothy)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER AND NOTICE: Motions under FR Civ P 12(b) - 3/14/2023. Last day for Rule 26(f) meeting - 3/21/2023. Last day to file Report of Parties' Planning Meeting and Scheduling Order Worksheet - 3/28/2023. Scheduling Conference at 2:00 PM in Charleston, West Virginia on 4/20/2023, before the undersigned, unless cancelled. Entry of Scheduling Order - 4/27/2023. Last day to serve FR Civ P 26(a)(1) initial disclosures pre-discovery - 5/4/2023. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 2/21/2023. (cc: counsel of record and any unrepresented party) (arb)
|
|
Filing 5
JOINT ANSWER TO #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by City of Oak Hill, Brandon Dodrill, Tyler Hogan. (Williams, Chip) (Modified on 2/21/2023 to add jury demand) (kew).
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Chip E. Williams, Jared Underwood on behalf of City of Oak Hill, Brandon Dodrill, Tyler Hogan. (Williams, Chip)
|
|
Filing 3
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER FOR ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES OF CIVIL ACTIONS ASSIGNED TO JUDGE IRENE C. BERGER ENTERED NOVEMBER 12, 2019. This matter referred to Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn for Discovery. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc)
|
|
Filing 2
ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to City of Oak Hill, Brandon Dodrill, Tyler Hogan, re: #1 Complaint. Summons returnable 21 days. Instructions to Counsel: This is your electronic summons. Please print as many copies of the Summons and Complaint as are necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. See Proof of Service page of this Summons form for filing a return of service if required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l). (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued - Tyler Hogan, #2 Summons Issued - City of Oak Hill) (msa)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT. Filing Fee $402.00. Receipt # AWVSDC-8353785. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summonses, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (msa)
|
|
CASE assigned to Judge Irene C. Berger. (klc)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
