Turley v. Kijakazi
| Steven T. Turley |
| Kilolo Kijakazi |
| 2:2023cv00191 |
| March 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Irene C Berger |
| Cheryl A Eifert |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS held before the Administrative Law Judge. (Bailey, Jason)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER AND NOTICE granting #1 APPLICATION by Steven T. Turley to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees or Costs; directing that any recovery obtained is to be paid to the Clerk, who will then pay all unpaid costs and fees and pay the balance to Plaintiff and his attorney, if any. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 3/10/2023. (cc: counsel of record) (kew)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc)
|
|
CASE assigned to Judge Irene C. Berger. (klc)
|
|
Filing 3
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO RULE 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, by Plaintiff Steven T. Turley. (msa)
|
|
Filing 2
COMPLAINT. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (msa)
|
|
Filing 1
APPLICATION by Steven T. Turley to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees or Costs. (msa)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
