Chapman v. State of West Virginia et al
| Oscar J. Chapman |
| State of West Virginia, John Doe, John Doe Commissioner, Shar. Ramsey and Lt. Ward |
| 2:2023cv00422 |
| June 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Thomas E Johnston |
| Dwane L Tinsley |
| Prisoner - (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MOTION by Oscar J. Chapman to File Only One Copy, Request for Appointment of Counsel, and Motion for Production of Supporting Documents. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley. (kew) |
| Filing 5 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc) |
| CASE assigned to Chief Judge Thomas E. Johnston. (klc) |
| Filing 4 Consent to Collection of Fees from Trust Account by Oscar J. Chapman. (lca) |
| Filing 3 PRISONER TRUST ACCOUNT REPORT by Oscar J. Chapman (Attachment: #1 Resident Transaction Details) (lca) (Modified on 6/9/2023 to convert event to prisoner trust account report) (ts). |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF INTENT TO SUIT. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (lca) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION by Oscar J. Chapman to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees or Costs. (lca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
