McConnell v. Ampex Brands of West Virginia, Inc. et al
| Earl McConnell and Donna McConnell |
| Ampex Brands of West Virginia, Inc., Kentucky Fried Chicken, KFC US, LLC, John Doe 1 and 2 and Ampex Brands of West Virginia, Inc. doing business as Kentucky Fried Chicken |
| 2:2023cv00466 |
| July 3, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Joseph R Goodwin |
| P.I.: Other |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER Having been advised by the parties of the settlement of this action, directing that this case be placed on the inactive docket; the parties may submit an agreed order of dismissal within 30 days of the entry of this order; otherwise, dismissal will be without prejudice; the court will reinstate this case to the active docket if one of the parties shows good cause within 30 days of the entry of this order. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 8/22/2023. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (jsa)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL directing that Plaintiff Donna McConnell is voluntary dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 8/8/2023. (cc: counsel of record) (lca) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL With Prejudice by Earl McConnell, Donna McConnell of Donna McConnell pursuant to Rule 41, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (kew) |
| NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re: #8 Notice of Partial Dismissal. ERROR: Filed using incorrect filing code. CORRECTION: Notice removed and filed at entry #9 using correct filing code. (kew) |
| Filing 8 INCORRECT ENTRY; SEE ENTRY #9. (Modified on 8/8/2023 to remove image and refile at entry #9 using correct filing code. (kew). |
| Filing 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO RULE 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, by Defendant Ampex Brands of West Virginia, Inc. (O'Brien, Melvin) |
| Filing 6 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO RULE 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, by Defendant KFC US, LLC (O'Brien, Melvin) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER TO COMPLAINT ATTACHED TO #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand by Ampex Brands of West Virginia, Inc., Kentucky Fried Chicken. (O'Brien, Melvin) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER TO COMPLAINT ATTACHED TO #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand by KFC US, LLC. (O'Brien, Melvin) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER AND NOTICE: Motions under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) - 7/27/2023. Last day for Rule 26(f) meeting - 8/9/2023. Last day to file report of Rule 26(f) meeting - 8/16/2023. Scheduling Conference at 9:00 AM on 8/30/2023 at the Robert C. Byrd United States Courthouse, 300 Virginia Street East, Room 6610 (Library/Conference Room), Charleston, WV. Entry of scheduling order - 9/5/2023. Last day to make Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures - 9/12/2023. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 7/6/2023. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (mfo)
|
| Filing 2 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Tinsley. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (ts) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Kentucky Fried Chicken, Ampex Brands of West Virginia, Inc., KFC US, LLC with summons, complaint and docket sheet from Circuit Court of Wood County. Filing Fee $402.00. Receipt #AWVSDC-8451364. (Attachments: #1 Summons and Complaint, #2 Wood County Circuit Court Docket, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (jsa) |
| CASE assigned to Judge Joseph R. Goodwin. (ts) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
