Wasanyi v. Aramark Services Incorporated et al
Plaintiff: David M. Wasanyi
Defendant: Aramark Services Incorporated and Brittany Hill
Case Number: 2:2023cv00575
Filed: August 25, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Presiding Judge: Thomas E Johnston
Referring Judge: Dwane L Tinsley
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 18, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER AND NOTICE granting #15 LETTER-FORM MOTION by David M. Wasanyi for Use of the Marshals Service to Serve the Defendants to the extent that service of process will be ordered at Plaintiff's expense; Plaintiff is directed to return the completed summonses previously sent to him by 10/27/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley on 10/18/2023. (cc: Plaintiff) (kew)
October 13, 2023 Filing 15 LETTER-FORM MOTION by David M. Wasanyi for Use of the Marshals Service to Serve the Defendants. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley. (kew)
October 5, 2023 Filing 14 SUMMONS ISSUED by the Clerk on behalf of David M. Wasanyi for Aramark Services Incorporated and Brittany Hill re: #1 Complaint, returnable 21 days. Original Summons and 1 copy returned to David M. Wasanyi by mail for service pursuant to #13 Order and Notice. (Attachment: #1 Summons as to Brittany Hill) (arb)
October 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER AND NOTICE directing the Clerk to issue summonses for each defendant, leaving the addresses blank for Plaintiff to fill in himself, and to mail the same to Plaintiff for attempted service on the defendants in accordance with Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The 90-day time period for service of process under Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure shall run from the date of this Order and Notice. Plaintiff must properly serve each defendant and file a certification demonstrating proof of such service on each defendant by that date. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley on 10/5/2023. (cc: Plaintiff) (arb)
October 4, 2023 Filing 12 Filing Fee: $402.00, Receipt No. 2001713. (arb)
September 28, 2023 Filing 10 AUTHORIZATION TO RELEASE INSTITUTIONAL ACCOUNT INFORMATION by David M. Wasanyi. (lca)
September 25, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER AND NOTICE denying the #5 APPLICATION by David M. Wasanyi to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs; directing Plaintiff to pay the filing fee, in full, by 10/16/2023. Issuance of summonses for Defendants shall not occur until the full filing fee is received. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley on 9/25/2023. (cc: Plaintiff and Trustee Clerk, Saint Marys Correctional Center and Jail) (arb)
September 25, 2023 Filing 8 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS by David M. Wasanyi. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (mfo) (Modified on 9/25/2023 to add attachment #1) (ts).
September 20, 2023 Filing 7 ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION by David M. Wasanyi in support of #5 APPLICATION by David M. Wasanyi to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees or Costs. (sealed pursuant to the #5 order) (kew)
September 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER directing the Clerk to file Plaintiff's tax return in support of the #5 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs UNDER SEAL. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley on 9/20/2023. (cc: Plaintiff) (kew)
September 20, 2023 Filing 5 APPLICATION by David M. Wasanyi to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees or Costs. (Attachments: #1 Resident Activity Statement, #2 Attachment, #3 Envelope) Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley. (kew)
August 29, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER AND NOTICE directing Plaintiff to either pay the filing fee in full or file an Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs by 9/19/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley on 8/29/2023. (cc: Plaintiff with attachments) (lca)
August 28, 2023 Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc)
August 25, 2023 CASE assigned to Chief Judge Thomas E. Johnston. (klc)
August 25, 2023 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by David M. Wasanyi for Interrogatories and Request for Documents. (lca)
August 25, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Envelope) (lca)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wasanyi v. Aramark Services Incorporated et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David M. Wasanyi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aramark Services Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brittany Hill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?