Mugrage et al v. Staley et al
Brenda Mugrage and Rusty Mugrage |
Seth Staley and Oglesby Construction, Inc. |
2:2023cv00587 |
August 31, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Dwane L Tinsley |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
|
Filing 6 RULE 26(f) REPORT OF PLANNING MEETING by Brenda Mugrage, Rusty Mugrage, Seth Staley, Oglesby Construction, Inc. (Leach, James) (Modified on 9/29/2023 to add party filers) (kew). |
Filing 5 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO RULE 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, by Defendant Oglesby Construction, Inc. (Gould, Charles) |
Filing 4 ANSWER TO COMPLAINT ATTACHED TO #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand by Oglesby Construction, Inc., Seth Staley. (Gould, Charles) |
|
Filing 2 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Tinsley. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc) |
CASE assigned to Judge Joseph R. Goodwin. (klc) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Seth Staley, Oglesby Construction, Inc., with summons, complaint, and docket sheet from the Circuit Court of Wood County. Filing Fee $402.00. Receipt #AWVSDC-8487975. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Certificate of Service, #6 Civil Cover Sheet) (mfo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.