Moore v. Ames
Juan Moore |
Donnie Ames |
2:2023cv00634 |
September 22, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
John T Copenhaver |
Cheryl A Eifert |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER granting Petitioner's #6 MOTION for Leave to Amend the Petition; Petitioner shall have ninety (90) days from entry of this Order in which to file his amended petition with memorandum in support; further directing that the #4 Order is set aside; Respondent shall now have 60 (sixty) days after receipt of the amended petition in which to answer or otherwise respond to the amended petition; Petitioner may, if he wishes, file a reply to the answer or response of the Respondent within thirty (30) days after service of same by the Respondent. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 10/6/2023. (cc: Petitioner; counsel of record) (lca) |
Filing 6 MOTION by Juan Moore for Leave to Amend the #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254). Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert. (Cooper, Jeremy) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Andrea N. Proper on behalf of Donnie Ames. (Proper, Andrea) |
Filing 4 SET ASIDE PURSUANT TO THE #4 ORDER ENTERED 10/6/2023: ORDER directing that the Respondent, on or before sixty days from entry of this Order, shall answer the Petition, showing cause, if he has any, why the relief sought by Petitioner should not be granted; Petitioner may, if he wishes, file a reply to the answer or response of the Respondent within thirty (30) days after service of same by the Respondent. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 9/26/2023. (cc: Attorney General of the State of West Virginia, with attachment, Petitioner, counsel of record) (lca) (Modified on 10/6/2023 to note order has been set aside pursuant to the #7 Order) (lca). |
Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc) |
CASE assigned to Senior Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. (klc) |
Filing 2 CLERK'S NOTICE OF FILING OF PETITION UNDER 28 USC 2254 FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (cc: counsel of record, Petitioner, Respondent) (lca) |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Juan Moore against Donnie Ames pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 2254. Filing Fee $5. Receipt # AWVSDC-8502450. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (lca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Moore v. Ames | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Juan Moore | |
Represented By: | Jeremy Benjamin Cooper |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Donnie Ames | |
Represented By: | Karen Villanueva-Matkovich |
Represented By: | Andrea N. Proper |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.