Warren et al v. LoanDepot.com, LLC
| David A Warren and Patricia A. Warren |
| LoanDepot.com, LLC |
| 2:2023cv00702 |
| October 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Thomas E Johnston |
| Consumer Credit |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE EXECUTED. Waiver signed by Regina J. McClendon, Esq. on 11/3/2023. LoanDepot.com, LLC waiver mailed on 11/3/2023, answer due 1/2/2024. (Hedrick, Denali) |
| Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Tinsley. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc) |
| Filing 2 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to LoanDepot.com, LLC, re: #1 Complaint. Summons returnable 21 days. Instructions to Counsel: This is your electronic summons. Please print as many copies of the Summons and Complaint as are necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. See Proof of Service page of this Summons form for filing a return of service if required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l). (mfo) |
| Filing 1 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT. Filing Fee $402.00. Receipt # AWVSDC-8526002. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons as to LoanDepot.com, LLC, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (mfo) |
| CASE assigned to Chief Judge Thomas E. Johnston. (klc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
