Haga v. Peachtree Inpatient Consulting, LLC
| Frances Haga |
| Peachtree Inpatient Consulting, LLC |
| 2:2023cv00730 |
| November 10, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Joseph R Goodwin |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 RULE 26(f) REPORT OF PLANNING MEETING by Frances Haga, Peachtree Inpatient Consulting, LLC. (Staun, Mark) (Modified on 12/29/2023 to add party filer) (kew). |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Abigail R. Martin on behalf of Peachtree Inpatient Consulting, LLC. (Sunseri, Anthony) |
Filing 6
ORDER AND NOTICE: Motions under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) - 12/26/2023. Last day for Rule 26(f) meeting - 1/8/2024. Last day to file report of Rule 26(f) meeting - 1/16/2024. Scheduling Conference at 9:30 AM on 1/29/2024 at the Robert C. Byrd United States Courthouse, 300 Virginia Street East, Room 6610 (Library/Conference Room), Charleston, WV. Entry of scheduling order - 2/5/2024. Last day to make Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures - 2/12/2024. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 12/4/2023. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (mfo)
|
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Peachtree Inpatient Consulting, LLC for First Set of Combined Discovery Requests to Plaintiff. (Sunseri, Anthony) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER TO #1 Complaint With Jury Demand by Peachtree Inpatient Consulting, LLC. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sunseri, Anthony) (Modified on 12/5/2023 to add jury demand) (kew). |
| Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Tinsley. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc) |
| Filing 2 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Peachtree Inpatient Consulting, LLC, re: #1 Complaint. Summons returnable 21 days. Instructions to Counsel: This is your electronic summons. Please print as many copies of the Summons and Complaint as are necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. See Proof of Service page of this Summons form for filing a return of service if required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l). (mfo) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing Fee $402.00. Receipt # AWVSDC-8533935. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons as to Peachtree Inpatient Consulting, LLC, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (mfo) |
| CASE assigned to Judge Joseph R. Goodwin. (klc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Haga v. Peachtree Inpatient Consulting, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Frances Haga | |
| Represented By: | Mark R. Staun |
| Represented By: | Robert Dean Hartley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Peachtree Inpatient Consulting, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Abigail Rose Martin |
| Represented By: | Anthony C. Sunseri |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
