Davis v. USP Big Sandy
Plaintiff: Demaurea Davis and De'Maurea Davis
Defendant: USP Big Sandy
Case Number: 2:2023cv00817
Filed: December 28, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Presiding Judge: Irene C Berger
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 3, 2024 Filing 6 CONFIRMATION from Eastern District of Kentucky that the case has been opened in that district as 7:24-cv-00001, filed 1/3/2024. (ts)
January 3, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE This matter is hereby TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky, Pikeville Division, for further consideration. The Clerk is directed to transmit Plaintiff's file to the Clerk of Courts at the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky. Plaintiff is advised that this matter will be assigned a new case number and will be assigned to a new judicial officer by the Clerk's Office for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky. Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 1/3/2024. (cc: Plaintiff; USDC/EDKY) (arb)
January 2, 2024 Filing 4 COMPLAINT. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (kew) (filed pursuant to the #3 order)
January 2, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER directing that Petitioner's #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 2241 be CONSTRUED as a civil action; the Clerk is directed to re-docket Petitioner's 2241 Petition as a Complaint pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 24 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 1/2/2024. (cc: Plaintiff) (kew)
December 29, 2023 Filing 2 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc)
December 28, 2023 CASE assigned to Judge Irene C. Berger. (klc)
December 28, 2023 Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by De'Maurea Davis against USP Big Sandy pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 2241. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (jsa) (Case converted to a Bivens action pursuant to #3 Order) (ts).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Davis v. USP Big Sandy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Demaurea Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: De'Maurea Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USP Big Sandy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?