Comer et al v. Diversified Production LLC
Rachel Comer and Scott Comer |
Diversified Production LLC |
2:2024cv00025 |
January 10, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Thomas E Johnston |
Torts to Land |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 6 RULE 26(f) REPORT OF PLANNING MEETING by Diversified Production LLC, Rachel Comer, Scott Comer. (Attachment: #1 Worksheet)(Casto, Matthew) (Modified on 3/4/2024 to add party filers) (kew). |
|
Filing 4 ANSWER TO AMENDED COMPLAINT ATTACHED TO #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Diversified Production LLC. (Casto, Matthew) (Modified on 1/18/2024 to remove jury demand) (kew). |
Filing 3 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO RULE 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, by Defendant Diversified Production LLC (Casto, Matthew) |
Filing 2 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Tinsley. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc) |
CASE assigned to Chief Judge Thomas E. Johnston. (klc) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Diversified Production, LLC with summons, verified complaint, verified amended complaint, and docket sheet from Circuit Court of Jackson County. Filing Fee $405.00. Receipt #AWVSDC-8571152. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (skm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.