Stebbins v. Moon et al
| David Stebbins |
| Joshua Moon and Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon and Lolcow LLC |
| 2:2024cv00140 |
| March 21, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Thomas E Johnston |
| Dwane L Tinsley |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER denying #14 EMERGENCY MOTION by David Stebbins for Expedited Consideration of #3 MOTION by David Stebbins for CM/ECF Access and for Stay of Proceedings or in the Alternative for Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley on 4/16/2024. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (kew)
|
| Filing 14 EMERGENCY MOTION by David Stebbins for Expedited Consideration of #3 MOTION by David Stebbins for CM/ECF Access and for Stay of Proceedings or in the Alternative for Protective Order. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley. (lca) |
| Filing 13 RESPONSE by David Stebbins in partial support and partial opposition of #11 MOTION by Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon for Hearing re: #1 APPLICATION by David Stebbins to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees or Costs. (lca) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER denying #6 MOTION by Joshua Moon, Lolcow LLC for Screening of In Forma Pauperis Complaint and for Leave to Supplement the Record and #11 MOTION by Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon for Hearing; this civil action is temporarily STAYED pending determination of #1 APPLICATION by David Stebbins to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees or Costs. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley on 4/15/2024. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (kew)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION by Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon for Hearing re: #1 APPLICATION by David Stebbins to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees or Costs. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit A) Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley. (Heath, Mark) |
| Filing 10 REPLY by Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon to #8 Response in Opposition. (Heath, Mark) (Modified on 4/3/2024 to correct link) (kew). |
| Filing 9 REPLY by David Stebbins to #7 Response. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (lca) |
| Filing 8 RESPONSE by David Stebbins in opposition to #6 MOTION by Joshua Moon, Lolcow LLC for Screening of In Forma Pauperis Complaint and for Leave to Supplement the Record re: #2 Complaint. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (lca) |
| Filing 7 OPPOSITION by Joshua Moon and Lolcow LLC to #3 MOTION by David Stebbins for CM/ECF Access. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit A)(Heath, Mark) |
| Filing 6 MOTION by Joshua Moon, Lolcow LLC for Screening of In Forma Pauperis Complaint and for Leave to Supplement the Record re: #2 Complaint. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley. (Heath, Mark) |
| Filing 5 STATEMENT OF VISITING ATTORNEY from Matthew Hardin on behalf of Joshua Moon and Lolcow LLC. Local counsel: Mark Heath. Fee $50.00. Receipt # AWVSDC-8620153. (Heath, Mark) |
| Filing 4 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: counsel of record and any pro se party) (klc) |
| CASE assigned to Judge Thomas E. Johnston. (klc) |
| Filing 3 MOTION by David Stebbins for CM/ECF Access. (kew) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope) (kew) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION by David Stebbins to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees or Costs. (kew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
